🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate atomic talks with Washington on condition that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has stated.

The Iranian diplomat declared only diplomacy produced results, and shared fresh requests had been made by mediators to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to access attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Route

Araghchi is navigating a complex course since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be operating from a position of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had emerged more powerful militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Previous Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with Donald Trump claiming the locations had been destroyed. Following this, Western states employed their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran insists they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could work inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the deal to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats stated the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the proposal could be reintroduced in various formats if negotiations restart.

The US president last week claimed he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from America either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of inactivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the forum, designed to portray the US as a dominant force that misuses the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi stated the two-week conflict demonstrated the conflict could not be settled by combat operations. He stated the attacks began with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with complete American awareness and collaboration, making faith hard to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had always tried to impose their demands during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and remains the primary solution to resolve conflicts, but its standards, regulations and principles must be followed."

"If they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and respect, they will obtain a reply in the identical approach."

Repair and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the struggle of restoration and reconstruction, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We acquired numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and gear, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the will of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more integrated, and more backing of the administration and the state in the face of this assault."